ResearcherFlow
Journal
Notes on literature review, experiment records and lab meetings, and on what new AI models change for a research week.
9 posts
Gemini 4 Argon is out. Here's what it means for your research week.
Google's Gemini 4 Argon is now broadly available. What it changes for grad students and postdocs, what it doesn't, and where the tedious parts still go.
Keep the interesting science. Hand off the tedious parts.
ResearcherFlow handles the tedious parts of research, like literature sweeps, run logs, and the Monday writeup, so you spend your time on the science.
Flow proposes. You approve.
Helpful AI is easy to ship; a durable lab record needs a named approval gate that keeps propose and write apart.
Claude-shaped still needs human taste
Technically correct is not yet science until experts steer. BootLoops is Schwartz’s; the lab gate is still human.
Nine loops still need a human yes
A frontier nine-loop result still needs human validation, publication, and a durable record — not a claim that we ran nine loops.
The Week of Record
PIs need literature in, next experiment out, and a Week of Record they can defend.
Keep the disagreements
When two papers disagree, the useful output is the disagreement itself — linked to its sources.
A better science engine still does not keep the log
A better science engine still has to read the literature you imported and the log you kept.
Write the run down the day it happens
By Friday the run finished. By Monday none of that is in one place. Log the outcome, the blocker, and the next step the same day the run ends.
Newsletter
Research workflows, in your inbox
New Journal posts and guides, and what changed in the product. Every email has a link to unsubscribe.